El Lector, De Bernhard Schlink. Uploaded Download as PPT, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd . blocwindcotssidi.ga International Acclaim for Bernhard Schlink's. “Arresting, philosophically elegant Bernhard Schlink was born in Germany in A professor of law at the. SILENCIO Y LIBERTAD EN EL LECTOR DE BERNHARD SCHLINK: LOS. ( PDF) Futurity: Contemporary Literature and the Quest for Detailed explanations .

El Lector Bernhard Schlink Pdf

Language:English, Arabic, French
Published (Last):01.05.2016
ePub File Size:28.77 MB
PDF File Size:16.25 MB
Distribution:Free* [*Register to download]
Uploaded by: GILBERT

The Reader Bernhard Schlink - [FREE] [PDF] [EPUB] The Reader DE BERNHARD SCHLINK: LOS silencio y libertad en el lector de. escrita por el profesor de leyes y juez alemán Bernhard. Schlink. - Tue, 02 Apr GMT Lector de PDF, visor PDF | Adobe Acrobat Reader DC. Summary by Chapter - The Reader by Bernhard Schlink. Bernhard Schlink (* 6. SILENCIO Y LIBERTAD EN EL LECTOR DE BERNHARD SCHLINK: LOS.

This explains many of Hanna's actions: her refusal of the promotion that would have removed her from the responsibility of supervising these women and also the panic she carried her entire life over being discovered. During the trial, it transpires that she took in the weak, sickly women and had them read to her before they were sent to the gas chambers.

Michael is uncertain if she wanted to make their last days bearable or if she sent them to their death so they would not reveal her secret. She is convicted and sentenced to life in prison while the other women receive only minor sentences.

After much deliberation, he chooses not to reveal her secret, which could have saved her from her life sentence, as their relationship was a forbidden one because he was a minor at the time.

You might also like: URDU NOVEL GUL E RANA PDF

Part 3[ edit ] Years have passed, Michael is divorced and has a daughter from his failed marriage. He is trying to come to terms with his feelings for Hanna and begins taping readings of books and sending them to her without any correspondence while she is in prison.

Hanna begins to teach herself to read, and then write in a childlike way, by borrowing the books from the prison library and following the tapes along in the text. She writes to Michael, but he cannot bring himself to reply. After 18 years, Hanna is about to be released, so he agrees after hesitation to find her a place to stay and employment, visiting her in prison.

On the day of her release in , she commits suicide and Michael is heartbroken. Michael learns from the warden that she had been reading books by many prominent Holocaust survivors, such as Elie Wiesel , Primo Levi , Tadeusz Borowski , and histories of the camps.

The warden, in her anger towards Michael for communicating with Hanna only by audio tapes, expresses Hanna's disappointment.

Hanna left him an assignment: give all her money to the survivor of the church fire. While in the U. She can see his terrible conflict of emotions and he finally tells of his youthful relationship with Hanna. The unspoken damage she left to the people around her hangs in the air. He reveals his short, cold marriage, and his distant relationship with his daughter.

The woman understands, but nonetheless refuses to take the savings Hanna had asked Michael to convey to her, saying, "Using it for something to do with the Holocaust would really seem like an absolution to me, and that is something I neither wish nor care to grant.

Having had a caddy stolen from her when she was a child in the camp, the woman does take the old tea caddy in which Hanna had kept her money and mementos. Returning to Germany, and with a letter of thanks for the donation made in Hanna's name, Michael visits Hanna's grave after ten years for the first and only time.

Style[ edit ] Schlink's tone is sparse; he writes with an "icy clarity that simultaneously reveals and conceals," as Ruth Franklin puts it, [3] a style exemplified by the bluntness of chapter openings at key turns in the plot, such as the first sentence of chapter seven: "The next night I fell in love with her.

Lillian Kremer, and the short chapters and streamlined plot recall detective novels and increase the realism. But it was too terrible for that. When I tried to understand it, I had the feeling I was failing to condemn it as it must be condemned. When I condemned it as it must be condemned, there was no room for understanding. But even as I wanted to understand Hanna, failing to understand her meant betraying her all over again. I could not resolve this.

I wanted to pose myself both tasks—understanding and condemnation. But it was impossible to do both. The driver who picks him up is an older man who questions him closely about what he believes motivated those who carried out the killings, then offers an answer of his own: An executioner is not under orders.

Navigation menu

He's doing his work, he doesn't hate the people he executes, he's not taking revenge on them, he's not killing them because they're in his way or threatening or attacking them. They're a matter of such indifference to him that he can kill them as easily as not.

The man stops the car and asks him to leave. Of the latter, the most important is the book by the death-march survivor that constitutes the basis of the case against Hanna. It is summarized at some length and even briefly quoted, although its title is never given. Michael must read it in English since its German translation has not yet been published: " It was an unfamiliar and laborious exercise at the time. And as always, the alien language, unmastered and struggled over, created a strange concatenation of distance and immediacy.

He cannot muster up the empathy to "make the experience part of his internal life," according to Froma Zeitlin. She tells Michael: I always had the feeling that no one understood me anyway, that no one knew who I was and what made me do this or that. He eventually receives a 'thank you' note from Hanna who has used her time in prison to learn to read and write. In , after serving a term of 18 years, Hanna's sentence is commuted.

The prison warden writes to Michael and asks him to become involved in Hanna's release from prison and reintegration into society. Michael obtains an apartment and a job, but he does not communicate with Hanna directly. On her last night in prison Hanna hangs herself in her jail cell.


When Michael arrives to receive Hanna the prison warden informs him of Hanna's suicide and allows him to enter the prison and view Hanna's small prison cell. Michael then contemplates the nature of his relationship with Hanna and compares it to the sociopolitical relationship of the post-war German generation to the generation of their parents.

Read more from the Study Guide. Browse all BookRags Study Guides. Copyrights The Reader from BookRags.

The Reader Summary & Study Guide

All rights reserved. Toggle navigation.

Sign Up. Sign In. Get The Reader from site. View the Study Pack.

View the Lesson Plans. Order our The Reader Study Guide. Plot Summary. Part 1, Chapter 1.

Human rights and justice essay

Part 1, Chapter 2. Part 1, Chapter 3.

Part 1, Chapter 4. Part 1, Chapter 5. Part 1, Chapter 6. Part 1, Chapter 7. Part 1, Chapter 8. Part 1, Chapter 9. To reject this classification and the criteria that define it, one also must reject the authority that sanctioned it.

This authority is so diffuse throughout society, that to reject it means to reject the entire society. The loss of both identity and context for establishing a new identity is the ultimate disorder, chaos.

Jean Korelitz, for example, herself a former admissions officer for Princeton, shows how pervasive the CPE is in the steps before entering the corporate world in her novel, Admission.

Princeton's 'pitch' to applicants is exactly the same as that of the Wall Street firms to its applicants: "As the best, you will want to stay among the best, so apply to Princeton. The message doesn't vary: "We are the best and will help you stay among the best.

And it is systematically defended even by those whom it excludes. The effects of CPE extend beyond those who are certifiably, as it were, the best to those who aspire to become part of the elite. Deficiencies are masked by the aspiration itself, which is merely the acceptance of the defining authority.

I can say with a moral certainty that all three of my acquaintances have what are, to them, equivalent to Hanna's secret deficiencies. Fear of exposure is therefore a powerful motivation to keep the system going, to promote its stable orderliness even when it is so evidently destructive.

Schlink's narrator, Michael Berg, knows that Hanna could not have committed the crimes she is accused of because of the secret she is unwilling to reveal. She may be guilty but not as guilty as she appears, or of what she is charged with. What duty does he have to unlock the door with which she has imprisoned herself? To speak up, either to her or the court, would expose her to profound shame, greater shame even than that of being found guilty of war crimes perhaps.

And if he does decide to speak up, how should he do it - to her? To her lawyer? To the judge? I feel the same dilemmas in advising my acquaintances, knowing that any mis-step could provoke yet more consternation as well as a pointed lack of gratitude for my solicited but still impertinent advice.

Berg's father, a philosopher, advises a simple ethical rule: don't try to second guess the criterion of the good that an individual has established for himself.

Diskontierung beispiel essay

This is useless advice. It simply anoints conformity as the ethical norm.

Conformity is the opposite of resistance, a capacity for which is essential to avoid personal co-optation, to either totalitarianism or corporatism. Resistance which can take many forms.She takes a dominant position in their relationship.

Science related things to research for essay

Part 3, Chapter 7. What duty does he have to unlock the door with which she has imprisoned herself? Part 1[ edit ] The story is told in three parts by the main character, Michael Berg. In he was conferred his PhD at Freiburg University and soon began teaching as a professor. We are all inevitably involved in this larger problem. Financial compensation had become just that - compensation for the companionship of marriage and family that had been denied. All three are, however, deeply dissatisfied with their lives.

Both remain somewhat distant from each other emotionally, despite their physical closeness. This psychic driver of "being the best you can" struck loud bells in my own experience.